Also, if you didn't make these and the creator requires credit, simply labeling them CC-BY with no further information does no good as the right person would not be credited.
"leading in temperature, pressure and level management"
I doubt wika.com is the site you had in mind.
In any case, if the notices are legit then the assets are indeed CC0, otherwise you need to refer to the specific license. "Commercial" doesn't sound like CC-BY, unless by "commercial" you mean "commercial use allowed".
Also, if credit is required, it is important to credit the right person. If you, Tozan, didn't make these, and the person who did requires credit, then that should be mentioned.
Welcome to OGA! I just thought I'd clear up some confusion about your choice of licenses.
It is common practice to dual-license something as "public domain" and something else for jurisdictions that don't recognize the public domain. However, CC0 is in fact a software license, so an additional license is unnecessary. It may actually add confusion, since it is unclear whether you require credit (CC-BY) or not (CC0). If you do require credit, instructions for giving credit might be helpful, and the CC0 license should be removed. If not, the CC-BY license should be removed.
Thank you, Sakura_Ninja. The WAV and MP3 have slightly different lengths and volume levels, so I am confident that the WAV is a higher quality. This is a great piece to have in my collection. I do prefer this over your previous dream ambience track. Something about this just seems more dream-like.
Also, if you didn't make these and the creator requires credit, simply labeling them CC-BY with no further information does no good as the right person would not be credited.
"leading in temperature, pressure and level management"
I doubt wika.com is the site you had in mind.
In any case, if the notices are legit then the assets are indeed CC0, otherwise you need to refer to the specific license. "Commercial" doesn't sound like CC-BY, unless by "commercial" you mean "commercial use allowed".
Also, if credit is required, it is important to credit the right person. If you, Tozan, didn't make these, and the person who did requires credit, then that should be mentioned.
Welcome to OGA! I just thought I'd clear up some confusion about your choice of licenses.
It is common practice to dual-license something as "public domain" and something else for jurisdictions that don't recognize the public domain. However, CC0 is in fact a software license, so an additional license is unnecessary. It may actually add confusion, since it is unclear whether you require credit (CC-BY) or not (CC0). If you do require credit, instructions for giving credit might be helpful, and the CC0 license should be removed. If not, the CC-BY license should be removed.
Thanks for playing the copyright game.
Absolutely beautiful.
It sounds like a 10-year-old banging on an electric piano. Good effort, though. It makes me laugh in pity. I don't mean to bully you.
On second thought, my own music is just as bad.
Been watching Lord of the Rings, have you?
Thank you, Sakura_Ninja. The WAV and MP3 have slightly different lengths and volume levels, so I am confident that the WAV is a higher quality. This is a great piece to have in my collection. I do prefer this over your previous dream ambience track. Something about this just seems more dream-like.
Could you upload an original higher quality (>5 MB) version, perhaps OGG or WAV? This could be used in a video project. Nice work.
Playing it all together as one piece tickles me.
OK
Pages