A strange stipulation which may not be enforceable, yet is nonetheless acceptable.
What about the other tunes? Are you saying you got them off of wikia.com? If they're from a game like God of War, you have to be absolutely sure they're public domain. This is dangerous territory to tread. What if somebody used one of the songs which happened to be proprietary? That would taint the material it's used in until the song is removed. It may not be discovered for years, but then all of a sudden it would have to be pulled from the market.
Also, if you didn't make these and the creator requires credit, simply labeling them CC-BY with no further information does no good as the right person would not be credited.
"leading in temperature, pressure and level management"
I doubt wika.com is the site you had in mind.
In any case, if the notices are legit then the assets are indeed CC0, otherwise you need to refer to the specific license. "Commercial" doesn't sound like CC-BY, unless by "commercial" you mean "commercial use allowed".
Also, if credit is required, it is important to credit the right person. If you, Tozan, didn't make these, and the person who did requires credit, then that should be mentioned.
Welcome to OGA! I just thought I'd clear up some confusion about your choice of licenses.
It is common practice to dual-license something as "public domain" and something else for jurisdictions that don't recognize the public domain. However, CC0 is in fact a software license, so an additional license is unnecessary. It may actually add confusion, since it is unclear whether you require credit (CC-BY) or not (CC0). If you do require credit, instructions for giving credit might be helpful, and the CC0 license should be removed. If not, the CC-BY license should be removed.
In terms of licensing, I am a little uneasy about this. The chiptune rendition of what is commonly known as the Tetris melody is trademarked, but the tune of the music itself is classical and therefore not copyrighted. If the word "Tetris" is not used, this still sounds much like the original Tetris music, which could therefore be an infringement if used commercially, especially in a game. In the case of somebody's YouTube video, it doesn't matter, but if this were mass-distributed as part of another product then I would be concerned about the legal situation. Perhaps somebody else can clear this up.
Thank you, Sakura_Ninja. The WAV and MP3 have slightly different lengths and volume levels, so I am confident that the WAV is a higher quality. This is a great piece to have in my collection. I do prefer this over your previous dream ambience track. Something about this just seems more dream-like.
A strange stipulation which may not be enforceable, yet is nonetheless acceptable.
What about the other tunes? Are you saying you got them off of wikia.com? If they're from a game like God of War, you have to be absolutely sure they're public domain. This is dangerous territory to tread. What if somebody used one of the songs which happened to be proprietary? That would taint the material it's used in until the song is removed. It may not be discovered for years, but then all of a sudden it would have to be pulled from the market.
Also, if you didn't make these and the creator requires credit, simply labeling them CC-BY with no further information does no good as the right person would not be credited.
"leading in temperature, pressure and level management"
I doubt wika.com is the site you had in mind.
In any case, if the notices are legit then the assets are indeed CC0, otherwise you need to refer to the specific license. "Commercial" doesn't sound like CC-BY, unless by "commercial" you mean "commercial use allowed".
Also, if credit is required, it is important to credit the right person. If you, Tozan, didn't make these, and the person who did requires credit, then that should be mentioned.
Welcome to OGA! I just thought I'd clear up some confusion about your choice of licenses.
It is common practice to dual-license something as "public domain" and something else for jurisdictions that don't recognize the public domain. However, CC0 is in fact a software license, so an additional license is unnecessary. It may actually add confusion, since it is unclear whether you require credit (CC-BY) or not (CC0). If you do require credit, instructions for giving credit might be helpful, and the CC0 license should be removed. If not, the CC-BY license should be removed.
Thanks for playing the copyright game.
Absolutely beautiful.
In terms of licensing, I am a little uneasy about this. The chiptune rendition of what is commonly known as the Tetris melody is trademarked, but the tune of the music itself is classical and therefore not copyrighted. If the word "Tetris" is not used, this still sounds much like the original Tetris music, which could therefore be an infringement if used commercially, especially in a game. In the case of somebody's YouTube video, it doesn't matter, but if this were mass-distributed as part of another product then I would be concerned about the legal situation. Perhaps somebody else can clear this up.
It sounds like a 10-year-old banging on an electric piano. Good effort, though. It makes me laugh in pity. I don't mean to bully you.
On second thought, my own music is just as bad.
Been watching Lord of the Rings, have you?
Many equally-sized photographic tile frames... With the right image processing script, one could make a cool video out of this.
Thank you, Sakura_Ninja. The WAV and MP3 have slightly different lengths and volume levels, so I am confident that the WAV is a higher quality. This is a great piece to have in my collection. I do prefer this over your previous dream ambience track. Something about this just seems more dream-like.
Pages