If you are a paying subscriber to Suno, then you own the songs you generate while subscribed to Pro or Premier, subject to your compliance with Suno’s Terms of Service.
If you are using a free version of Suno, we retain ownership of the songs you generate, but you are allowed to use those songs for non-commercial purposes, subject to your compliance with Suno’s Terms of Service.
Suno is best suited for making new music with new lyrics, and you must obtain permission for any and all lyrics and other content that you upload to Suno or otherwise incorporate into your songs. See Suno’s Terms of Service for a more detailed discussion about the ownership and usage rules for the content generated using Suno.
That's an interesting passage. I'll have my lawyer take a look at that. The best I can do is say that I have a paid subscription that allows for commercial use:
Please tell us more about why we should be worried about Nintendo chasing after us if we use your resources. Are you hosting materials that you did not 100% create?
The terms for submitting music on the platform specify certain requirements that differ notably from those for art, particularly when AI is involved. For music, submissions must meet specific technical standards for format and quality, such as a minimum of 128kbps for MP3s, though higher-quality formats like OGG and FLAC are preferred. This is different from the requirements for art, where the emphasis is on ensuring non-watermarked, usable submissions without technical limitations on format. While both art and music submissions need to be provided in usable formats, the precise audio format rules for music add an additional layer of specificity.
A key distinction for AI-generated submissions lies in how the platform treats AI-generated art versus music. AI-assisted artwork is currently download-disabled due to intellectual property concerns, while music doesn't have a similar blanket restriction on AI-generated content. The platform mandates that anyone submitting AI-generated art must declare the technology and version used, linking to the AI tool's terms of use. Music submissions, by contrast, focus on technical quality and do not require disclosure of whether AI was used, unless explicitly tied to copyright issues.
If you feel this is in error, then I recommend taking it up with the site and requesting that they update their Terms and Services, demanding that they include AI music in the requirements.
Also, demand that they list which AI technologies are included in the mandate. I have countless algorithms that create music programmatically, from simple arpeggiators to $1,000 effects pedals.
FAQ:
Who owns the songs I generate using Suno?
If you are a paying subscriber to Suno, then you own the songs you generate while subscribed to Pro or Premier, subject to your compliance with Suno’s Terms of Service.
If you are using a free version of Suno, we retain ownership of the songs you generate, but you are allowed to use those songs for non-commercial purposes, subject to your compliance with Suno’s Terms of Service.
Suno is best suited for making new music with new lyrics, and you must obtain permission for any and all lyrics and other content that you upload to Suno or otherwise incorporate into your songs. See Suno’s Terms of Service for a more detailed discussion about the ownership and usage rules for the content generated using Suno.
That's an interesting passage. I'll have my lawyer take a look at that. The best I can do is say that I have a paid subscription that allows for commercial use:
Faq: https://suno-ai.notion.site/FAQs-b72601b96de44e5cacd2cd6baa985448
...
... With sugar on top?
Pretty Please?
As you wish. I hope it changes too. Please make a carification in the music section as well.
Please tell us more about why we should be worried about Nintendo chasing after us if we use your resources. Are you hosting materials that you did not 100% create?
The terms for submitting music on the platform specify certain requirements that differ notably from those for art, particularly when AI is involved. For music, submissions must meet specific technical standards for format and quality, such as a minimum of 128kbps for MP3s, though higher-quality formats like OGG and FLAC are preferred. This is different from the requirements for art, where the emphasis is on ensuring non-watermarked, usable submissions without technical limitations on format. While both art and music submissions need to be provided in usable formats, the precise audio format rules for music add an additional layer of specificity.
A key distinction for AI-generated submissions lies in how the platform treats AI-generated art versus music. AI-assisted artwork is currently download-disabled due to intellectual property concerns, while music doesn't have a similar blanket restriction on AI-generated content. The platform mandates that anyone submitting AI-generated art must declare the technology and version used, linking to the AI tool's terms of use. Music submissions, by contrast, focus on technical quality and do not require disclosure of whether AI was used, unless explicitly tied to copyright issues.
If you feel this is in error, then I recommend taking it up with the site and requesting that they update their Terms and Services, demanding that they include AI music in the requirements.
Also, demand that they list which AI technologies are included in the mandate. I have countless algorithms that create music programmatically, from simple arpeggiators to $1,000 effects pedals.
This a great idea! I'm all about the responsible promotion of Atrificail Intelegence in the creative world.
Pages