"Generated by AI so it's a theft from other artists, so it's free."

while no truer statement has probably ever been made, this makes it not compatible with OGA's policies

Nope; IMO that's not a true statement, unless everything I've ever drawn is also a theft from every artist whose work that I have ever seen with my eyes.

Nonetheless, AFAIK, being AI generated does mean it is in violation of OGA's temporary AI policy (which I can't find pinned, but I'm sure that MedicineStorm will provide).

Also, this looks very similar to "Kravilion"'s work, augmented by an endearing misunderstanding of what pixels are for.

Yeah, I don't agree that AI generation made with millions of images is theft.

Honestly, a real pixel artist probably commits more theft in their work than AI does.

unless everything I've ever drawn is also a theft from every artist whose work that I have ever seen with my eyes.

This conflates inspiration with derivation. These are not the same thing. The difference between the two is the heart of the AI art debate. Regardless, kooow was aware of the temporary AI policy already, having self-submitted this page to AI assisted artwork collection before the first comment was made here. :)