Hernandack Potion Pack Digital Painting (30)
30 Potions ideas of bottles mixed with liquid in Digital Painting style.
Each image has 1024 x 1024 resolution, you may resize it to be smaller if using it for game icons.
It fits well if you add some border frame like in HUD, shoping interface or any UI invetory menu.
Free to use for commercial and non-commercial.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Additonal note as this assets uses some part of AI GAN using StableDiffusion with FantasifiedIcon model (this is from QnA with the owner):
Q: Is it ok to use images generated by this model for commercial purposes? I was thinking maybe I could generate icons etc for my game that I'm currently developing.
A: hey, sorry for the late reply! yeah if you're a single dev or a team under 10 people it's fine
Comments
Colorful.
What technology was used to create these?
Hi, I only know that OGA is somewhat grey on AI GAN art with some manual modification / refinement.
So I added the attribution update on the post. Now I am not sure if the license (like CC-BY-03) is correct or not, since it's the first time I uploaded AI GAN using StableDiffusion on this site but on the owner of the model itself it said it's fine to be used with proper credit.
That's why I added some license / copyright note.
Is it illegal here or am I missing something?
Thanks for the extra attribution! that will certainly help when we assess AI submissions! :)
See https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork
The "gray area" is not about which AI art is allowed and which AI art is not, its about when (if ever) AI art is allowed in general. Currently, the answer is "not yet" because the courts have yet to make a firm determination on how GANs may infringe upon copyright or not. (AI art cannot be copyrighted, but it may still infringe upon existing copyrights)
If the GAN is demonstrably trained on exclusively openly licensed content, then there is no issue. However, StableDiffusion, MidJourney, et al have NOT trained on openly licensed content, so their infringement status is uncertain.
There are a few GANs out there trained purely on openly licensed (or owned) content, but to the best of my knowledge, they also have terms of use that are incompatible with open licenses like the ones required on OGA.
In this case, the infomation you indicated above appears to be the worst of both: the GAN was trained on questionable content- making it's infringement status uncertain- AND the terms of use conflict with CC-BY 3.0 (and all other licenses accepted on OGA); CC-BY doesn't forbid people who are NOT a single dev team of less than 10 people from using the assets, but the terms of use here do. Additionally, any stipulation that "requires prior authorization" is incompatible, because none of the licenses here can enforce requesting separate authorization. The stipulation in this case is regarding revenue, which essentially makes this a Non-Commercial license.
"free to use with proper credit but only if you're < 10 devs and no commercial use" ≠
CC-BY 3.0TL;DR: Worry not! You haven't broken any rules. It isn't that it's illegal here. The problem is, it might get devs in trouble later if they use it. Until we know for sure they're safe to use, we have to disable downloads of such assets. Sorry for the trouble and let me know if you have any questions.