Blasteroids Art Pack CC BY 3.0
Thursday, August 11, 2016 - 21:57
Art Type:
License(s):
Collections:
Favorites:
2
Share Icons:
Preview:
A collection of art from myself and others that I used in an asteroids-like game. Most of the art is modified by me, and there are a few (mediocre) original works. There are no animations.
See also my Blasteroids SFX Pack and Blasteroids Art Pack CC0 for the rest of the game's assets.
Copyright/Attribution Notice:
See credits.md in the download. For my work you can credit me just as Rodeo and put a link to my profile.
File(s):
blasteroids-art-cc-by-3.zip 17.4 Kb [47 download(s)]
Comments
OGA cannot host CC BY-NC assets. Would you be willing to relicense those as the same license as the other assets in the set?
Sorry, I read through the posting guidelines and thought I didn't see anything about that in there, but I guess I was wrong.
I will go through all the links and check the licenses. For now I will remove the CC-BY-NC assets pending a response from their creators (if I can get a hold of them) letting me know whether they would be willing to relicense.
I will relicense all of my assets to CC BY 3.0.
Does OGA accept CC BY 4.0? There are a few items in there that are licensed with 4.0. The terms on the summary page appear the same between 3.0 and 4.0 but I didn't bother with the legal text. Let me know if I should remove those too.
That's fine. The guideline is easy to miss. It can be found here under
The "available licenses" being CC-BY 3.0, CC-BY-SA 3.0, GPL 3.0, GPL 2.0, OGA-BY 3.0, or CC0. Keep in mind there are also other licenses that allow you to relicense the conent under one of these licenses. WTFGPL can be relicensed as CC0, for example.
OGA doesn't currently support CC BY 4.0 specifically, but it is very similar to version 3.0 so I am confident version 4.0 will be added in the future. In the meantime, you can use CC BY 3.0 and check the "Allow later license versions" which will allow it to be licensed as CC BY 4.0 when it becomes available on OGA.
CC BY 3.0 may even allow for relicensing to CC BY 4.0 already, but i'll have to double check on that. Not sure if those should be removed or not. It would only be a problem if the original artist objected to the terms in the CC BY 3.0, but best to verify.
EDIT: Currently this listing shows licenses CC BY 3.0 and CC0. This tells people they may choose either one for all assets in the set. I think these asssets need to be separated by licence and submitted separately. Otherwise this implies people may use all the assets in this zip file under CC0. (or CC BY, which is still not really true.)
Ok I've removed the CC 4.0 assets as I can't get a hold of the guy. I briefly read through the legal text of 3.0 and 4.0 and didn't see anything about licenses being forward or backward compatible with each other.
I'm also separating the assets into different submissions by license.
Groovy. Thanks for your willingness to resolve this so quickly.
Nice assets!