Alternate Skin Pack for Sara The Racer in SuperTuxKart 1.2
Instructions: copy and replace files in data/karts/sara_the_racer folder in stk 1.2 with ones in the mod zip fie...keep a backup of original files if you want to revert changes...
As per the agreement of GPLv3 the modified material is being released...source material is GPL and CC0 and maybe CC-BY-SA and LGPL all of which are compatible with one another under GPLv3...
https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/com...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Python-logo-notext.svg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snake_silhouette.svg
Python is owned by Python Software Foundation and released under GPL compatible PSFL...
SuperTuxKart credits: https://github.com/supertuxkart/stk-code/blob/master/data/CREDITS
is released under GPLv3
https://github.com/supertuxkart/stk-code/blob/master/COPYING
Sara is OpenGameArt mascot
This mod loosely resembles RenPy mascot Eileen who is not yet in STK as of version 1.2...
renpy released under LGPL license and more permissive licenses https://www.renpy.org/doc/html/license.html
renpy credits: https://github.com/renpy/renpy/graphs/contributors
alttexturesara.zip 1.4 Mb [20 download(s)]Textures in this Pack
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Comments
When you say "Art is either GPLv3 or CC-BY-SA" are you saying all these textures can be GPL if I wanted... or they could all be CC-BY-SA if I so choose?
Or is it that any given texture in this pack is one of the two?
Just assume it's all GPLv3 so it can only be used in compatible projects...we only added CC-BY-SA to cover our backs since SuperTuxKart repository says it uses such licenses for assets but isn't clear about which asset is covered by which license...just remember to cite CC-BY-SA license along with GPLv3 when using it for your own projects...
That... is not permitted here. I appreciate the clarification, but the assets of a submission must be compatible with the listed license in their entirety. If there are parts of the submission that do not fall under the license(s) listed, those parts must be submitted separately under that other license.
If you're not clear on which assets fall under CC-BY-SA and not GPL, then none of the unclear assets should be included.
If, on the other hand, you're saying every asset can be under the GPL, but only some of them are also under CC-BY-SA as well, then you must only list the license(s) common to all assets. In such case, this submission would be just GPL since not all the assets are dual-licensed as both GPL and CC-BY-SA.
Found Correct License: GPLv3 https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/com...
Groovy. Looks good. Thanks!