48 x 48 Pixel Sharp Dungeon Tiles
Author:
Monday, January 17, 2022 - 08:44
Art Type:
License(s):
Favorites:
4
These tiles were created for a small dungeon project that ended up not being completed. I negotiated the tiles for free release and here they are. Thank you! If you like my work, please consider my patreon https://www.patreon.com/lorestrome where I make different projects and tilesets and just general art. Also consider buying my games on steam!
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1708970/The_Prince_of_Landis/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/440410/Wolfsong/
Copyright/Attribution Notice:
Please feel free to use these in your commercial game.
File(s):
high_res_pixel.png 37.9 Kb [401 download(s)]
high_res_pixel2.png 135.5 Kb [339 download(s)]
high_res_pixel3.png 31 Kb [316 download(s)]
high_res_pixel4.png 7.2 Kb [331 download(s)]
Comments
Beautiful!
FYI, CC-BY-SA allows people to try* reselling the assets as is, so the stipulation about "don't resell" really should not be included.*They can try, but they probably won't be successful since anyone who would resell these can be required to link back to this page. Any potential customers would see that the assets are free and not bother to pay for them. Also, there's this, too as far as NFTs go, or anyone implying free assets can only be obtained via purchase.Thanks, so which copyright thing best matches my conditions? I read about this stuff for about an hour and gave up on trying to understand it.
CC-BY-SA is the one that best matches your conditions, it just doesn't allow that condition to be added; it'll be pretty hard for anyone to resell them as is.
If you're insisting on keeping that stipulation, then none of them fit: forbidding resale crates a lot of unintended legal problems, even for non commercial projects, so any such EULAs are not accepted on OGA. If the concern is related to reselling under exclusive terms, like NFTs, that's already illegal under CC-BY-SA without the need for the extra stipulation.I've been having a LOT of people reselling my tiles the past year and it's making me not want to release my sets. I've always been very giving with my assets to help out indies but I'm starting to get tired of it.
Understood and agreed. If those people are not crediting you and not linking back to the page they got your assets from, they're breaking the terms of the license. Either those people need to get in trouble for breaking the terms of CC-BY* or they aren't going to be deterred by saying "no resale" anyway.
I don't think you can stop them. And what other choice do you have, except to consign the work to the great hard drive in the sky? I suppose you could try to hold onto them in case they can be shoe-horned into some future project.
Some really cool detail in this one. Love the floor and the tables of junk especially.
I would love for this to stay on OGA.
Is there any way to find compatible terms? Unless the conflicting stipulations can be resolved, we won't be able to host this awesome asset on OGA.It's more important that game creators have assets to build with than it is for me to be overly protective of this work.
To elaborate on what MedicineStorm said, you should have some recourse against people selling your assets in violation of the license (e.g. without crediting you, noting the license, and linking to the original).
If they are selling thru a marketplace (e.g. itch.io, Unity Asset Store, ArtStation, etc.), you can first report them through the platform. That is fairly likely to be successful. If that does not work and either you or the website owner are located in the United States, you can send a DMCA takedown notice to the platform holder or the ISP hosting the website. Wikipedia provides an overview of the process, with examples (which refer to Wikipedia, but you can adapt to your purposes) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks#Non-compliance... .
If that fails, your final recourse is to sue to have the item taken down, although the details of that depend on the jurisdiction where you reside, where the website is hosted, and obviously that is expensive, a lot of work, and not guaranteed to be successful.
I understand your feelings about abused work. We have resources we can provide (like making DMCA's really easy) and helping to report your work whenever we find it being abused. Though, I am happy to hear you feel the sharing of these assets is more important.
In light of that, would you be willing to remove or alter the 'no resale' stipulation from the submission above? As it is now, I cannot remove the "licensing issue" lock because it conflicts with CC-BY-SA's "no additional restrictions" clause.EDIT: Fixed, thanks! :)
updated it
@MedicineStorm Is this post meant to be stuck at the top of the Latest Art page?
Nope. It isn't stuck, really. Just bumped for a day because it wasn't available for a month after its original posting.
Thanks so much for posting this, Hyptosis! I love the way the floor tiles imply so much texture, but they're borderless so you can mix and match. Very effective. Also the giant anvil is so cool, lots of personality there.
Looks like there is some banding in the preview image, but it's not present in the actual download.
Sorry for the insane late reply. What branding, the floor pattern is missing?