This was MedicineStorm's concern in the other submission:

 

In general, you may use outputs from generative AI features commercially. However, if Adobe designates in the product or elsewhere that a beta version of a generative AI feature cannot be used commercially, then the generated outputs from that beta feature are for personal use only and cannot be used commercially.

So commercial use is supported conditionally.

Correct. That restriction is only for beta Firefly, which is not the version used on these.

I dunno, I'm still pretty unsure about allowing generative AI 'art' on OGA. It kind of defeats the purpose IMHO.

huh?

hold up

what purpose of oga is this defeating

I think the argument is that OpenGameArt is about art and allowing "AI art" defeats the purpose of it because "AI art" is not real art or something?

OGA is for the purpose of providing open assets for game development that anyone can use. I don't see how allowing for AI art negates that, especially since the AI art is marked as AI art to begin with. If you don't want to use AI art, then don't use AI art. There's plenty of art on this website that's not AI art. And the team on the website are being restrictive on how much is allowed at a time to not flood the latest entries with nothing but AI generated stuff.

The main reason I'm not using AI generation is because the stuff I have seen through AI art generation just doesn't look good enough. Its good enough for concept art but not for actual real usage.

I would like to point out that we have not allowed AI art on OGA. There have been 60 AI art submissions on OGA so far. Of those, we have (tentatively) allowed two.*

Assets with quesitonable legal origins are not allowed, including AI submissions from technology who's training data may be considered unethically obtained.

Assets that are, in essence, functionally unusable in a game or trivial to produce are not allowed, including AI submissions that have had little or no human artistic input, curation, or refinement.

*With that being said, there seems to be entirely too much uncertainty and instability about AI art as an art medium. At least for now. Not because we fear new things that are hard to understand, but because AI art itself is uncertain what role it should be playing. 

If anyone has thoughts about what role AI art should have here on OGA, even if that role is "exile" in your opinion, share your thoughts here (on the separate AIAA thread). Please include your reasoning. Why do you feel that way? What purpose does OGA have in your view, and how does AI art defeat or support that purpose in your opinion?

Yeah for me personally I experimented with AI art mostly to get some rough concepts down. Nothing I saw actually looked usable in any project, game or otherwise.

Thanks for providing that update, I'm sure others who have major concerns like that will find it appreciated.